Boom Time for US Billionaires: How the System Perpetuates Wealth Inequality
Among countless US citizens, the economy over the past five years has been challenging. Prices have soared while pay remains stagnant. Elevated mortgage rates have made purchasing property a grim prospect. The rate of unemployment has been slowly rising.
Many Americans have reported they're postponing major life decisions, including having kids or switching jobs, because of economic uncertainty. But for a select few of people, the recent half-decade couldn't have been more successful.
Wealth Explosion
The wealth of the world's billionaires grew 54% in 2020, at the height of the pandemic. And even during all the financial uncertainty, the stock market has only continued to grow. This growth has largely benefited just a small number of Americans: 10% of the population owns 93% of stock market wealth.
Despite the imbalance as this distribution seems, it's the system working as it is presently configured.
"Affluent individuals have bought their jets, they've acquired their multiple houses and mansions, but now they're securing senators and media outlets," commented inequality researcher Chuck Collins. "We're now stepping into this other chapter of hyper-extraction where the wealthy are exploiting the system of inequality."
Mapping Economic Classes
To help others understand what exactly it means to be "wealthy" in the US, Collins borrows a concept from journalist Robert Frank who, in a 2007 book on the rich, conceptualized the different levels of wealth as "Affluencia" villages: Prosperity Village, Lower Richistan, Middle Richistan, Upper Richistan and Billionaireville.
To update the concept, Collins organizes these "affluence districts" based on income levels:
- At the lowest tier, Affluent Town, are the 10 million Americans who have a annual salary of at least $110,000 and an total assets of over $1.5m.
- The villages get more restricted as wealth goes up: Lower Richistan has 2.6 million households who have wealth between $6m and $13m.
- Middle Richistan has 1.3 million households who have assets worth an average of $37m.
- Upper Richistan, made up of 130,000 Americans (roughly the size of a small city) has between $60m to $1bn in wealth.
In total, the residents of these villages constitute the top 10% of the wealth income distribution, about 14 million Americans altogether, though their experiences vary dramatically.
"You could be in Lower Richistan, and you're still traveling in the coach section of a commercial plane," Collins noted. "Whereas in Upper Richistan, you're using a private jet. That's a really different cultural experience. You fly private, you have no interest in the commercial aviation system. You don't care if the whole system collapses – you're set."
The Billionaireville Effect
The highest hill in "Richistan" is Billionaireville, which is made up of about 800 American billionaires who are some of the world's richest. The control that this group has substantially outweighs those who are simply well-off, let alone the average American who doesn't inhabit "Richistan" at all.
But Collins thinks the progressive slogan "billionaires shouldn't exist" misses the point and has a "hint of elimination" to it.
"It's the separation between individual behaviors and a structure of regulations," Collins explained. "We should be focused on an economic system that funnels so much wealth upward to the billionaires."
Wealth Accumulation Mechanisms
To understand how wealth at the billionaire level works, Collins separates it into four parts: getting the wealth, securing fortune, policy control and maximum resource extraction.
When many Americans think about wealth, they usually think only about the first step, Collins said. People can create a reasonable quantity of wealth through starting or running a successful business, which could get them admission in Affluent Town.
But getting to Billionaireville requires serious investment and strategy in those next three steps. Collins describes what he calls the "asset protection sector": the tax lawyers, accountants and wealth managers who use their skills to ensure that the super rich are being strategic about their taxes.
"Wealth defense professionals use a broad range of tools such as trusts, foreign deposits, secret corporations, philanthropic entities and other vehicles to hold assets," he writes.
Political Influence and Hyper-Extraction
To advance a wealth defense strategy, a family needs political support. Wealth of over $40m becomes political power, Collins says, and can be used to secure fortune and protect its accumulation.
The last stage is a different kind of wealth accumulation, one that Collins calls "extreme removal" to describe how the wealthy have come to touch nearly every single part of an Americans' daily existence largely through private equity, which allows wealthy individuals to support private companies.
"Private equity is looking for those sectors of the economy where they can squeeze things a little bit harder," Collins said. "One thing I don't think people comprehend is these billionaire private-equity funds are what happens when so much wealth is accumulated in so few hands, and they can essentially pivot and say, 'Where else can we extract profits out of the economy?' Healthcare? Great. Mobile home parks? These people can't go anywhere, [so] you can increase their costs."
The Real Consequences
The effects of this inequality go beyond the wealth getting wealthier. It's about people spending additional funds for their healthcare, rent and vet bills without seeing any significant salary growth. And Collins said the hardship and discontent of this kind of society can lead to profound dissatisfaction.
"The most powerful oligarchs understand people are being marginalized [and] are economically suffering," Collins said, adding that Republicans have been good at connecting with a potent "fake grassroots movement".
Government Truth
The contradiction, Collins points out in his book, is that government officials have appointed a series of billionaires to administrative posts. Along with affluent innovators who had temporary but significant roles overseeing substantial reductions to the federal workforce, other key positions for commerce, treasury, education and the interior are also all billionaires.
This government structure, along with help from legislative supporters, helped pass significant fiscal policies, which will make lasting reductions for the wealthy and corporations.
The Path Forward
While government groups continue to argue that foreign entry and bad trade agreements are the source of everyone's economic problems, "the challenge is: Will the opposing party, which has also been influenced by the billionaires and big money, be able to seriously confront the underlying harms?" Collins said.
Progressive politicians, he argues, know what policies are needed to "alter economic flow", including substantial modifications to the tax system, raising the minimum wage and empowering worker groups.
"It was so, so close, and the law really did embody the will of the majority of people who really want lawmakers to solve some of these critical challenges," Collins said. "Elite control is not about building so much as stopping. It's easier to block than it is to make something substantial take place, but the muscle memory is there. We know what that looks like."
Collins is optimistic that there can be change, but said it would require sustained political momentum.
"It may be quickly that the pendulum swings back, and then it really is about maintaining a sustained really popular movement to make progress on this extreme inequality we're living in," he said. "We can solve this. It is fixable."