🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have decided to withdraw from an international accord designed to safeguard females from abuse, including domestic abuse, following extensive and intense discussions in the legislature.

Thousands of protesters assembled in the capital this week to oppose the vote. The ultimate authority now lies with Head of State the nation's president, who must decide whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Referred to as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all types of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the initial EU country to initiate the process of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey withdrew in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations described as a significant setback for women's rights.

Political Debate and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the EU in last year, yet conservative groups have contended that its emphasis on equal rights undermines traditional families and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, lawmakers decided by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the convention, a move sponsored by opposition parties but backed by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the primary political groups supporting the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova appealed for the treaty not to be politicized, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent vote has sparked broad outcry both within Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a Latvian appeal calling for the convention to be maintained. The gender equality group the rights center has called a demonstration for the coming week, charging MPs of disregarding the wishes of the Latvian people.

International Worries and Possible Future Actions

The head of the European organization's parliamentary assembly commented that the Baltic state had made a hasty decision driven by false information. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty four years ago, cases of femicide and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority support, the president could possibly send back the legislation for additional review if he holds concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics stated on social media that he would evaluate the vote according to legal principles, "taking into account state and legal factors, instead of belief-based viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a worrisome development for women's rights not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," commented a human rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been rising in several EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• The nation's vote could influence similar discussions in other member states