🔗 Share this article

While dawn was breaking the Amazonian city of Belém on Saturday morning, delegates remained confined in a enclosed conference room, oblivious whether it was day or night. For more than 12 hours in difficult discussions, with numerous ministers representing 17 groups of countries ranging from the least developed nations to the wealthiest economies.

Tempers were short, the air thick as exhausted delegates confronted the grim reality: they were unlikely to achieve a comprehensive agreement in Brazil. The latest global climate summit teetered on the brink of complete breakdown.

The major obstacle: Fossil fuels

Scientific evidence has shown for nearly a century, the carbon dioxide produced by burning fossil fuels is increasing temperatures on our planet to alarming levels.

Nevertheless, during nearly three decades of annual climate meetings, the essential necessity to stop fossil fuel use has been addressed only once – in a resolution made two years ago at previous UN climate talks to "transition away from fossil fuels". Representatives from the Middle Eastern nations, Russia, and a few other countries were resolved this would not be repeated.

Mounting support for change

Simultaneously, a increasing coalition of countries were just as committed that movement on this issue was vitally needed. They had developed a plan that was earning increasing support and made it clear they were prepared to dig in.

Less wealthy nations desperately wanted to make progress on securing funding support to help them address the growing impacts of climate disasters.

Critical moment

During the night of Saturday, some delegates were willing to walk out and cause breakdown. "It was on the edge for us," remarked one energy minister. "I considered to walk away."

The breakthrough occurred through discussions with Saudi Arabia. Shortly after 6am, senior representatives separated from the main group to hold a private conversation with the lead Saudi negotiator. They pressed wording that would indirectly acknowledge the global commitment to "shift from fossil fuels" made two years earlier in Dubai.

Unanticipated resolution

Rather than explicitly referencing fossil fuels, the text would refer to "the previous commitment". Upon deliberation, the Saudi delegation unexpectedly accepted the wording.

Participants expressed relief. Celebrations began. The settlement was completed.

With what became known as the "Amazon accord", the world took a modest advance towards the phaseout of fossil fuels – a uncertain, insufficient step that will scarcely affect the climate's ongoing trajectory towards crisis. But nevertheless a significant departure from complete stagnation.

Key elements of the agreement

• In addition to the indirect reference in the official document, countries will commence creating a roadmap to systematically reduce fossil fuels
• This will be largely a optional undertaking led by Brazil that will provide updates next year
• Addressing the essential decreases in greenhouse gas emissions to remain below the 1.5C limit was likewise deferred to next year
• Developing countries achieved a tripling to $120bn of regular financial support to help them cope with the impacts of extreme weather
• This amount will not be completely provided until 2035
• Workers will benefit from a "equitable change process" to help people working in polluting businesses move toward the sustainable sector

Differing opinions

With global conditions approaches the brink of climate "critical thresholds" that could eliminate habitats and force whole regions into crisis, the agreement was far from the "major breakthrough" needed.

"Cop30 gave us some baby steps in the correct path, but considering the magnitude of the climate crisis, it has not met the occasion," cautioned one climate expert.

This limited deal might have been all that was possible, given the international tensions – including a US president who avoided the talks and remains wedded to oil and coal, the growing influence of conservative movements, persistent fighting in multiple regions, extreme measures of inequality, and global economic instability.

"Major polluters – the fossil fuel giants – were at last in the spotlight at these negotiations," comments one environmental advocate. "This represents progress on that. The opportunity is available. Now we must turn it into a real fire escape to a safer world."

Deep fissures revealed

Even as nations were able to welcome the formal approval of the deal, Cop30 also highlighted deep fissures in the primary worldwide framework for confronting the climate crisis.

"International summits are agreement-dependent, and in a period of geopolitical divides, unanimity is progressively challenging to reach," stated one global leader. "It would be dishonest to claim that Cop30 has delivered everything that is needed. The disparity between present circumstances and what evidence necessitates remains dangerously wide."

If the world is to avoid the worst ravages of climate crisis, the international negotiations alone will prove insufficient.